Difference between revisions of "Minmatar"

From Basin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created with SafariJack's 15 October 2006 content from old Vigil page, and MMAgCh's 29 July 2007 content from old Prowler page)
 
(Tabulated fittings, other minor changes)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{EVE nav}}
+
{{EVE nav|Minmatar=}}
 
{{Intro}}
 
{{Intro}}
 
*[http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Minmatar Minmatar] (EVElopedia)
 
*[http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Minmatar Minmatar] (EVElopedia)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
===Vigil===
 
===Vigil===
  
====Jamming Tackler====
+
;Jamming Tackler
 
Intent is to live a little longer by breaking your target's lock on you.  Your ECM can stack with others in your group, so it is beneficial to all as long as you are alive.
 
Intent is to live a little longer by breaking your target's lock on you.  Your ECM can stack with others in your group, so it is beneficial to all as long as you are alive.
  
  
;High
+
{{Text table}} width=100%
 +
|-
 +
!width=33%|High slots
 +
!width=34%|Mid slots
 +
!width=33%|Low slots
 +
|-valign=top
 +
|
 
* Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain
 
* Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain
 
* Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain
 
* Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain
 
* 125mm Gatling AutoCannon I
 
* 125mm Gatling AutoCannon I
 
+
|
;Mid
 
 
* 1MN MicroWarpdrive I
 
* 1MN MicroWarpdrive I
 
* Warp Scrambler I
 
* Warp Scrambler I
 
* ECM - Multispectral Jammer I
 
* ECM - Multispectral Jammer I
 
+
|
;Low
 
 
* Reactor Control Unit I
 
* Reactor Control Unit I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 +
|}
  
;Stats
+
 
 +
Stats:
 
*240 shield, 1.42/s, E/T/K/Ex=0/20/40/60
 
*240 shield, 1.42/s, E/T/K/Ex=0/20/40/60
 
*262 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
 
*262 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
Line 36: Line 42:
 
*2478.7692307692305 m/s
 
*2478.7692307692305 m/s
 
*0.0 DPS
 
*0.0 DPS
<br>
 
  
====Tracking Disruption Tackler====
+
 
 +
;Tracking Disruption Tackler
 
Intent is to live a little longer through making it harder to hit while orbiting.  This will not help vs. drones or missiles.
 
Intent is to live a little longer through making it harder to hit while orbiting.  This will not help vs. drones or missiles.
  
  
;High
+
{{Text table}} width=100%
 +
|-
 +
!width=33%|High slots
 +
!width=34%|Mid slots
 +
!width=33%|Low slots
 +
|-valign=top
 +
|
 
* Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain
 
* Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain
 
* Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain
 
* Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain
 
* 125mm Gatling AutoCannon I
 
* 125mm Gatling AutoCannon I
 
+
|
;Mid
 
 
* 1MN MicroWarpdrive I
 
* 1MN MicroWarpdrive I
 
* Warp Scrambler I
 
* Warp Scrambler I
 
* Tracking Disruptor I
 
* Tracking Disruptor I
 
+
|
;Low
 
 
* Reactor Control Unit I
 
* Reactor Control Unit I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 +
|}
 +
  
;Stats
+
Stats:
 
*240 shield, 1.42/s, E/T/K/Ex=0/20/40/60
 
*240 shield, 1.42/s, E/T/K/Ex=0/20/40/60
 
*262 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
 
*262 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
Line 63: Line 75:
 
*2478.7692307692305 m/s
 
*2478.7692307692305 m/s
 
*0.0 DPS
 
*0.0 DPS
<br>
 
  
====Stop that Inty in its Tracks Tackler====
+
 
 +
;Stop that Inty in its Tracks Tackler
 
This one is a tad crazy, it's designed to knock out 80 cap/activation from your target.  This may be enough to stop an into by breaking a MWD cycle.  The only problem is once you do this, you can't run any of your modules either.
 
This one is a tad crazy, it's designed to knock out 80 cap/activation from your target.  This may be enough to stop an into by breaking a MWD cycle.  The only problem is once you do this, you can't run any of your modules either.
  
  
;High
+
{{Text table}} width=100%
 +
|-
 +
!width=33%|High slots
 +
!width=34%|Mid slots
 +
!width=33%|Low slots
 +
|-valign=top
 +
|
 
* Small Energy Neutralizer I
 
* Small Energy Neutralizer I
 
* Small Energy Neutralizer I
 
* Small Energy Neutralizer I
 
* Turret Slot / Launcher Slot
 
* Turret Slot / Launcher Slot
 
+
|
;Mid
 
 
* 1MN MicroWarpdrive I
 
* 1MN MicroWarpdrive I
 
* Warp Scrambler I
 
* Warp Scrambler I
 
* Stasis Webifier I
 
* Stasis Webifier I
 
+
|
;Low
 
 
* Reactor Control Unit I
 
* Reactor Control Unit I
 
* Reactor Control Unit I
 
* Reactor Control Unit I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure I
 +
|}
 +
  
;Stats
+
Stats:
 
*240 shield, 1.42/s, E/T/K/Ex=0/20/40/60
 
*240 shield, 1.42/s, E/T/K/Ex=0/20/40/60
 
*262 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
 
*262 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
Line 96: Line 114:
 
===Prowler===
 
===Prowler===
  
====General travel setup====
+
;General travel set-up
 
Don't even attempt to fly this ship without at least Engineering IV. You won't even be able to stick a MWD on it otherwise. For the most part, modules should be best named or T2. See comments for limitations on this.
 
Don't even attempt to fly this ship without at least Engineering IV. You won't even be able to stick a MWD on it otherwise. For the most part, modules should be best named or T2. See comments for limitations on this.
  
  
;High Slots
+
{{Text table}} width=100%
 +
|-
 +
!width=25%|High slots
 +
!width=25%|Mid slots
 +
!width=25%|Low slots
 +
!width=25%|Rigs
 +
|-valign=top
 +
|
 
* Prototype Cloaking Device
 
* Prototype Cloaking Device
 
* Salvager
 
* Salvager
 
+
|
;Mid Slots
 
 
* 10MN Microwarp Drive
 
* 10MN Microwarp Drive
 
* Invulnerability Field
 
* Invulnerability Field
 
* Kinetic Deflection Amplifier
 
* Kinetic Deflection Amplifier
 
+
|
;Low Slots
 
 
* Inertial Stabilizer
 
* Inertial Stabilizer
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure
 
* Nanofiber Internal Structure
 
+
|
;Rigs
+
* 2 Polycarbon Engine Housings, or something else that helps speed/agility
* preferably 2x Polycarbon Engine Housings, or something else that helps speed/agility
+
|}
  
  
On the one hand, the Prowler is the fastest blockade runner in EVE bar none, being extremely nimble and capable of reaching speeds well in excess of 2 km/s if set up right. On the other hand, it has a somewhat subpar slot layout; both Gallente and Amarr transports can do much better than two low slots, and the Caldari T2 indies boast slightly more mid slots. Its above-average speed and agility make up for this to some degree, but flying a Prowler generally doesn't leave much room for error.
+
On the one hand, the Prowler is the fastest blockade runner in EVE bar none, being extremely nimble and capable of reaching speeds well in excess of 2 km/s if set up right. On the other hand, it has a somewhat sub-par slot layout; both Gallente and Amarr transports can do much better than two low slots, and the Caldari T2 indies boast slightly more mid slots. Its above-average speed and agility make up for this to some degree, but flying a Prowler generally doesn't leave much room for error.
  
As the only blockade runner with two high slots, what you stick in the second one really is your call. Having a cloak in slot one pretty much is required, as it will save you time and time again in hostile territory. I chose a salvager personally, but you may as well leave it empty.
+
As the only blockade runner with two high slots, what you stick in the second one really is your call. Having a cloak in slot 1 pretty much is required, as it will save you time and time again in hostile territory. I chose a salvager personally, but you may as well leave it empty.
  
Mids are tricky. The MWD is a given (has to be named T1, by the way -- even with Engineering V you can't fit a T2 one unless you wish to delve into fitting mods), but beyond that you've got some leeway. Personally, I went with a Kinetic Deflection Amplifier and an Invulnerability Field (both T2). The former is used to plug the resistance hole in Minmatar T2 shield tanks, while the latter just adds some overall resistances in case Something Bad Happens. And yes, that's a passive kinetic hardener. Replacing it with an active hardener is perfectly possible; I originally went with the passive module in order to be as NOS-proof as possible. (Back then, I used a small cap booster in place of the invul field.)
+
Mid slots are tricky. The MWD is a given (has to be named T1, by the way -- even with Engineering V you can't fit a T2 one unless you wish to delve into fitting mods), but beyond that you've got some leeway. Personally, I went with a Kinetic Deflection Amplifier and an Invulnerability Field (both T2). The former is used to plug the resistance hole in Minmatar T2 shield tanks, while the latter just adds some overall resistances in case Something Bad Happens. And yes, that's a passive kinetic hardener. Replacing it with an active hardener is perfectly possible; I originally went with the passive module in order to be as NOS-proof as possible. (Back then, I used a small cap booster in place of the invul field.)
  
Lows are tricky, too! With only two slots available, you have to be picky about what to fit. You can accommodate two more warp core stabilizers, for a total of +4 to warp strength, meaning you'll require five or more points to be locked down. It's better than nothing, but in a bubble all the stabs in the world won't save you. Furthermore, fitting WCS means you won't be fitting any speed/agility mods, and that's not so good either when you need to burn back to that gate ''stat''. I decided to go with one inertial stabilizer and nanofiber internal structure each, which provide a nice balance between reducing mass and improving agility, allowing the ship to travel and align faster. And that's what counts, right?
+
Low slots are tricky, too! With only two slots available, you have to be picky about what to fit. You can accommodate two more warp core stabilizers, for a total of +4 to warp strength, meaning you'll require five or more points to be locked down. It's better than nothing, but in a bubble all the stabs in the world won't save you. Furthermore, fitting WCS means you won't be fitting any speed/agility mods, and that's not so good either when you need to burn back to that gate ''stat''. I decided to go with one inertial stabilizer and nanofiber internal structure each, which provide a nice balance between reducing mass and improving agility, allowing the ship to travel and align faster. And that's what counts, right?
  
Rigs depend on what exactly you need the ship for, but generally you can't go wrong with some form of astronautic rig. Polycarbs are very nice (luckily I got mine before the crazy increase in price), but Low Friction Nozzle Joints will work as well. Their drawback (reduced armor hitpoints) isn't all that bad, because face it: when you're in armor, you are pretty much gone already.
+
Rigs depend on for what exactly you need the ship, but generally you can't go wrong with some form of astronautic rig. Polycarbs are very nice (luckily I got mine before the crazy increase in price), but Low Friction Nozzle Joints will work as well. Their drawback (reduced armor hit points) isn't all that bad, because face it: when you're in armor, you are pretty much gone already.
  
Assuming you manage to decide on a setup, it's quite the lovely ship. I really like flying mine, even in perfectly safe Empire space. It aligns like a somewhat sluggish frigate and warps at 9 AU/s; great for errands!
+
Assuming you manage to decide on a set-up, it's quite the lovely ship. I really like flying mine, even in perfectly safe Empire space. It aligns like a somewhat sluggish frigate and warps at 9 AU/s; great for errands!

Latest revision as of 12:41, 15 September 2012