User talk:Trang Oul

Suggestion

Hey Trang Oul,

May I suggest that before you add a D2R RW to a new attribute page that you change existing "yes" for "Ladder" to "yes (LoD only)" until we have found a better solution if it hasn't been done yet? Otherwise we'll have both "yes (D2R only" and plain "yes" on a page which is even more confusing, as can be seen on the "cannot be frozen" page before I changed it. Thanks! Best, Naturelover (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2024 (EDT)

Sure. I'm thinking about using a template (multiple or, better, one parametrized) for all those "Yes (LoD only)" and so on ladder/availability descriptions. Then we'll be able to change all pages at once, if we decide to change those labels. Trang Oul (talk) 09:08, 20 June 2024 (EDT)

individual rune pages

Hi again!

I won't be using the individual rune pages (like Eld Rune or Ko Rune at all, so don'T care about the format. So would you prefer seperate columns for LoD and D2R patches / ladder or integrated into one column for patch / ladder? Just let me know that we don'T do any work twice, thanks. Naturelover (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2024 (EDT)

I'd go for atomic (separate) data. Sortable and more readable. Trang Oul (talk) 10:26, 20 June 2024 (EDT)

Patches

Hello again,

me once more. I just noticed that Blizzard use a 2.x.y format for their patches for d2r (current is 2.7.3 e.g.) and not 1.ab like they used to with d2 and lod. So all my 2.00 2.40 and 2.60 edits were wrong and should've been 2.6 or 2.6.0 instead. I don't think I'm going to change it. But just wanted to let you know that I screwed up in this regard. :( Cheers, Naturelover (talk) 07:28, 22 June 2024 (EDT)

Hi Naturelover,

In my edits I've used x.y format (i.e. only major and minor, without patch (as defined here)). This is the format used in news (examples: 2.4, [1]), and also used by the community, since only the "big" patches introduced new features. But maybe we should be more detailed here? On the other hand, unlike LoD, I don't think it is even possible to install older D2R patches, so that information is purely historical.
PS. Shall I answer you here or on your page? :) Trang Oul (talk) 02:00, 25 June 2024 (EDT)

Hello TO,

answering here is fine.

I'll leave it to you how we/you record the patch number. As you said, it's purely historical anyway. :)

Cheers, Naturelover (talk) 18:16, 25 June 2024 (EDT)