Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mage Talent Ratings"

From Basin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I thought having the talent names listed in the tier title didn't add much.  Also having the required number of points at a glance seemed more usefull.
+
I thought having the talent names listed in the tier title didn't add much.  Also having the required number of points at a glance seemed more usefull. - TacoSupreme
  
 
I was just following the format from the Rogue/Warrior Talent pages.  We should make all the Talent pages similar in format, at least for the headers.  Malaclypse added the Talent names to the Tier titles in a pass over the Rogue Talents I think it was. - Jini
 
I was just following the format from the Rogue/Warrior Talent pages.  We should make all the Talent pages similar in format, at least for the headers.  Malaclypse added the Talent names to the Tier titles in a pass over the Rogue Talents I think it was. - Jini
 +
 +
I did add them to Rogue Talents, after I saw the Warrior Talents page and how useful it was to have the individual talents show up in the ToC. I think that is more useful then having the number of points in the ToC. - Malaclypse
 +
 +
Ya having the talent names show up in the ToC is pretty usefull.  I was just saying when looking at a talent it was usefull to see the number of points that tier required at a glance.  Will try to fix it =p  - TacoSupreme
 +
 +
Actually how about replacing the tier name with "0 Fire - " etc?  That sounds like an ok way to do it to me. - TacoSupreme
 +
 +
''0 fire? I think the tier system is more intuitively obvious. Is the math of tier number, minus one, times five that hard for people? All tier 5 skills require 20 ranks in the tree - people are going to figure that out pretty quick. I think it would be redundant to keep repeating it everywhere. The tier system is also used by other sites, and people will be used to it.'' - Malaclypse, entirely non-committally

Latest revision as of 10:09, 21 November 2004

I thought having the talent names listed in the tier title didn't add much. Also having the required number of points at a glance seemed more usefull. - TacoSupreme

I was just following the format from the Rogue/Warrior Talent pages. We should make all the Talent pages similar in format, at least for the headers. Malaclypse added the Talent names to the Tier titles in a pass over the Rogue Talents I think it was. - Jini

I did add them to Rogue Talents, after I saw the Warrior Talents page and how useful it was to have the individual talents show up in the ToC. I think that is more useful then having the number of points in the ToC. - Malaclypse

Ya having the talent names show up in the ToC is pretty usefull. I was just saying when looking at a talent it was usefull to see the number of points that tier required at a glance. Will try to fix it =p - TacoSupreme

Actually how about replacing the tier name with "0 Fire - " etc? That sounds like an ok way to do it to me. - TacoSupreme

0 fire? I think the tier system is more intuitively obvious. Is the math of tier number, minus one, times five that hard for people? All tier 5 skills require 20 ranks in the tree - people are going to figure that out pretty quick. I think it would be redundant to keep repeating it everywhere. The tier system is also used by other sites, and people will be used to it. - Malaclypse, entirely non-committally