Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mage Talent Ratings"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I did add them to Rogue Talents, after I saw the Warrior Talents page and how useful it was to have the individual talents show up in the ToC. I think that is more useful then having the number of points in the ToC. - Malaclypse | I did add them to Rogue Talents, after I saw the Warrior Talents page and how useful it was to have the individual talents show up in the ToC. I think that is more useful then having the number of points in the ToC. - Malaclypse | ||
| − | Ya having the talent names show up in the ToC is pretty usefull. I was just saying when looking at a talent it was usefull to see the number of points that tier required at a glance. Will try to fix it =p -TacoSupreme | + | Ya having the talent names show up in the ToC is pretty usefull. I was just saying when looking at a talent it was usefull to see the number of points that tier required at a glance. Will try to fix it =p - TacoSupreme |
| + | |||
| + | Actually how about replacing the tier name with "0 Fire - " etc? That sounds like an ok way to do it to me. - TacoSupreme | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''0 fire? I think the tier system is more intuitively obvious. Is the math of tier number, minus one, times five that hard for people? All tier 5 skills require 20 ranks in the tree - people are going to figure that out pretty quick. I think it would be redundant to keep repeating it everywhere. The tier system is also used by other sites, and people will be used to it.'' - Malaclypse, entirely non-committally | ||
Latest revision as of 10:09, 21 November 2004
I thought having the talent names listed in the tier title didn't add much. Also having the required number of points at a glance seemed more usefull. - TacoSupreme
I was just following the format from the Rogue/Warrior Talent pages. We should make all the Talent pages similar in format, at least for the headers. Malaclypse added the Talent names to the Tier titles in a pass over the Rogue Talents I think it was. - Jini
I did add them to Rogue Talents, after I saw the Warrior Talents page and how useful it was to have the individual talents show up in the ToC. I think that is more useful then having the number of points in the ToC. - Malaclypse
Ya having the talent names show up in the ToC is pretty usefull. I was just saying when looking at a talent it was usefull to see the number of points that tier required at a glance. Will try to fix it =p - TacoSupreme
Actually how about replacing the tier name with "0 Fire - " etc? That sounds like an ok way to do it to me. - TacoSupreme
0 fire? I think the tier system is more intuitively obvious. Is the math of tier number, minus one, times five that hard for people? All tier 5 skills require 20 ranks in the tree - people are going to figure that out pretty quick. I think it would be redundant to keep repeating it everywhere. The tier system is also used by other sites, and people will be used to it. - Malaclypse, entirely non-committally