Difference between revisions of "User talk:Trang Oul"

From Basin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
I won't be using the individual rune pages (like [[Eld Rune]] or [[Ko Rune]] at all, so don'T care about the format. So would you prefer seperate columns for LoD and D2R patches / ladder or integrated into one column for patch / ladder? Just let me know that we don'T do any work twice, thanks. [[User:Naturelover|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover|talk]]) 09:03, 20 June 2024 (EDT)
 
I won't be using the individual rune pages (like [[Eld Rune]] or [[Ko Rune]] at all, so don'T care about the format. So would you prefer seperate columns for LoD and D2R patches / ladder or integrated into one column for patch / ladder? Just let me know that we don'T do any work twice, thanks. [[User:Naturelover|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover|talk]]) 09:03, 20 June 2024 (EDT)
 +
 +
I'd go for atomic (separate) data. Sortable and more readable. [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 10:26, 20 June 2024 (EDT)

Revision as of 09:26, 20 June 2024

Suggestion

Hey Trang Oul,

May I suggest that before you add a D2R RW to a new attribute page that you change existing "yes" for "Ladder" to "yes (LoD only)" until we have found a better solution if it hasn't been done yet? Otherwise we'll have both "yes (D2R only" and plain "yes" on a page which is even more confusing, as can be seen on the "cannot be frozen" page before I changed it. Thanks! Best, Naturelover (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2024 (EDT)

Sure. I'm thinking about using a template (multiple or, better, one parametrized) for all those "Yes (LoD only)" and so on ladder/availability descriptions. Then we'll be able to change all pages at once, if we decide to change those labels. Trang Oul (talk) 09:08, 20 June 2024 (EDT)

individual rune pages

Hi again!

I won't be using the individual rune pages (like Eld Rune or Ko Rune at all, so don'T care about the format. So would you prefer seperate columns for LoD and D2R patches / ladder or integrated into one column for patch / ladder? Just let me know that we don'T do any work twice, thanks. Naturelover (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2024 (EDT)

I'd go for atomic (separate) data. Sortable and more readable. Trang Oul (talk) 10:26, 20 June 2024 (EDT)