Difference between revisions of "User talk:Trang Oul"
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I won't be using the individual rune pages (like [[Eld Rune]] or [[Ko Rune]] at all, so don'T care about the format. So would you prefer seperate columns for LoD and D2R patches / ladder or integrated into one column for patch / ladder? Just let me know that we don'T do any work twice, thanks. [[User:Naturelover|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover|talk]]) 09:03, 20 June 2024 (EDT) | I won't be using the individual rune pages (like [[Eld Rune]] or [[Ko Rune]] at all, so don'T care about the format. So would you prefer seperate columns for LoD and D2R patches / ladder or integrated into one column for patch / ladder? Just let me know that we don'T do any work twice, thanks. [[User:Naturelover|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover|talk]]) 09:03, 20 June 2024 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'd go for atomic (separate) data. Sortable and more readable. [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 10:26, 20 June 2024 (EDT) |
Revision as of 09:26, 20 June 2024
Suggestion
Hey Trang Oul,
May I suggest that before you add a D2R RW to a new attribute page that you change existing "yes" for "Ladder" to "yes (LoD only)" until we have found a better solution if it hasn't been done yet? Otherwise we'll have both "yes (D2R only" and plain "yes" on a page which is even more confusing, as can be seen on the "cannot be frozen" page before I changed it. Thanks! Best, Naturelover (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2024 (EDT)
Sure. I'm thinking about using a template (multiple or, better, one parametrized) for all those "Yes (LoD only)" and so on ladder/availability descriptions. Then we'll be able to change all pages at once, if we decide to change those labels. Trang Oul (talk) 09:08, 20 June 2024 (EDT)
individual rune pages
Hi again!
I won't be using the individual rune pages (like Eld Rune or Ko Rune at all, so don'T care about the format. So would you prefer seperate columns for LoD and D2R patches / ladder or integrated into one column for patch / ladder? Just let me know that we don'T do any work twice, thanks. Naturelover (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2024 (EDT)
I'd go for atomic (separate) data. Sortable and more readable. Trang Oul (talk) 10:26, 20 June 2024 (EDT)