Difference between revisions of "Talk:Set"

From Basin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(Reply)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Formatting set sources ==
 
== Formatting set sources ==
  
On some pages set sources have the number of items formatted plain like "(''n'' items)"/"(Full)" ([https://www.theamazonbasin.com/wiki/index.php?title=Energy&oldid=69122#Pelt example]), on some they're formatted as "({{S|=''n''}})" for individual item bonuses ([https://www.theamazonbasin.com/wiki/index.php?title=Increased_Attack_Speed&oldid=69104#Gloves example]) and "({{U|=''n''}})"/"({{U|=F}})" for set bonuses ([https://www.theamazonbasin.com/wiki/index.php?title=Cannot_be_Frozen&oldid=68938#Set_bonus example]).<br/>
+
On some pages set sources have the number of items formatted plain like "(''n'' items)"/"(Full)" ([[Energy#Pelt|example]]), on some they're formatted as "({{S|=''n''}})" for individual item bonuses ([[Increased Attack Speed#Gloves|example]]) and "({{U|=''n''}})"/"({{U|=F}})" for set bonuses ([[Cannot be Frozen#Set bonus|example]]).<br/>
 
Which style is "canon"/preferred (I assume there is no reason to use both)? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 10:02, 26 February 2026 (EST)
 
Which style is "canon"/preferred (I assume there is no reason to use both)? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 10:02, 26 February 2026 (EST)
 +
 +
: There's no canon, although I think (n items) or (Full) is better. I normally prefer keeping things as short and simple as possible, but ({{S|=n}}) or ({{U|=F}}) could be mistaken for references, even without superscript.
 +
 +
: Incidentally, if you want to link to one of our wiki pages, you don't normally need the full URL: you can just use <code><nowiki>[[Page#Section|Label]]</nowiki></code> (like the examples I edited above). [[User:Onderduiker|Onderduiker]] ([[User talk:Onderduiker|talk]]) 13:56, 27 February 2026 (EST)

Latest revision as of 13:56, 27 February 2026

Formatting set sources

On some pages set sources have the number of items formatted plain like "(n items)"/"(Full)" (example), on some they're formatted as "(n)" for individual item bonuses (example) and "(n)"/"(F)" for set bonuses (example).
Which style is "canon"/preferred (I assume there is no reason to use both)? Trang Oul (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2026 (EST)

There's no canon, although I think (n items) or (Full) is better. I normally prefer keeping things as short and simple as possible, but (n) or (F) could be mistaken for references, even without superscript.
Incidentally, if you want to link to one of our wiki pages, you don't normally need the full URL: you can just use [[Page#Section|Label]] (like the examples I edited above). Onderduiker (talk) 13:56, 27 February 2026 (EST)